Frank
Comparison guide

Synology vs QNAP

For most home and small-office buyers in 2026 Synology wins on software polish and a cleaner security track record, but QNAP wins on raw hardware value and transcoding, so the DS923+ is our overall pick while the QNAP TS-464 takes the value crown.

Updated June 2026 ยท 6 picks compared ยท every weakness listed

This is a head to head, not a popularity contest. Synology and QNAP both make solid NAS boxes, and the right answer depends entirely on what you value. Synology bets on its DSM operating system, a tight app ecosystem, and a conservative, locked-down approach (including a controversial move toward verified drives on some newer models). QNAP undercuts on price, ships more powerful hardware (faster CPUs, 2.5GbE, sometimes built-in HDMI), and is far more flexible, but its software is busier and its security history is rougher. Below are the representative models on each side so you can match the box to your actual needs rather than the brand hype.

Trust scores on this page are our editorial judgement. For scores built from the latest sources, ask Frank for a live report.

Side by side

The short version

Product comparison
Product Trust Price Best for Buy
#1
91 $600 (diskless, before drives) Home and small-office users who value DSM software and reliability over raw specs Check price →
#2
QNAP TS-464
Best value
85 $580 (diskless, before drives) Value hunters and media servers (Plex/Jellyfin) who want transcoding and 2.5GbE Check price →
#3
Synology DS224+
Best budget Synology
83 $300 (diskless, before drives) First-time buyers who want DSM for backups, files, and light photo duties Check price →
#4
QNAP TS-264
Best budget QNAP
80 $450 (diskless, before drives) Budget media servers and tinkerers who want power and ports for less Check price →
#5
Synology DS423+
Best for first-party apps
82 $430 (diskless, before drives) Households wanting a 4-bay DSM box for Synology Photos and backups, not transcoding Check price →
#6
QNAP TS-673A
Premium pick
84 $900 (diskless, before drives) Power users running VMs, containers, and heavy multi-user workloads Check price →

We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It does not change the ranking.

The picks

Every choice, with its trade-offs

#1 Top pick

Synology DS923+

The best-rounded 4-bay for people who want a NAS that mostly runs itself with the least drama.

Trust 91
91/100

What holds up

  • +DSM is the most polished, beginner-friendly NAS OS available
  • +Strong, mature first-party apps (Synology Photos, Drive, Hyper Backup)
  • +ECC memory support and an optional 10GbE upgrade slot
  • +Cleaner security and patch-response track record than QNAP

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’AMD Ryzen R1600 has no integrated GPU, so no hardware video transcoding
  • โˆ’Pricey for the specs, and only 1GbE ports out of the box in 2026
  • โˆ’Synology has been tightening its drive-compatibility policy, which limits HDD choice
Best for Home and small-office users who value DSM software and reliability over raw specs $600 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
#2 Best value

QNAP TS-464

More hardware for the money than the Synology equivalent, with proper hardware transcoding built in.

Trust 85
85/100

What holds up

  • +Intel Celeron N5095 with an iGPU handles hardware video transcoding well
  • +Dual 2.5GbE ports and two M.2 NVMe slots at this price
  • +HDMI out for direct media playback or a local console
  • +Open about third-party drive use, so you buy whatever disks you want

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’QTS is more cluttered and has a steeper learning curve than DSM
  • โˆ’QNAP's security history includes serious ransomware campaigns (Deadbolt, Qlocker)
  • โˆ’First-party app polish trails Synology, especially photo and backup apps
Best for Value hunters and media servers (Plex/Jellyfin) who want transcoding and 2.5GbE $580 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
#3 Best budget Synology

Synology DS224+

The simplest, cheapest way into the DSM ecosystem for backups and file sharing.

Trust 83
83/100

What holds up

  • +Same well-regarded DSM experience at an entry price
  • +Two 2.5GbE ports, a nice step up for a budget 2-bay
  • +Low power draw and quiet, good as an always-on appliance

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’Intel Celeron J4125 is modest and not meant for heavy multi-stream transcoding
  • โˆ’Only 2 bays, so storage headroom runs out fast
  • โˆ’RAM tops out at 6GB, limiting how many apps and containers you run
Best for First-time buyers who want DSM for backups, files, and light photo duties $300 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
#4 Best budget QNAP

QNAP TS-264

A punchy little 2-bay that out-specs its Synology rival, if you can stomach QTS.

Trust 80
80/100

What holds up

  • +Intel Celeron N5095 with iGPU gives real hardware transcoding in a 2-bay
  • +Dual 2.5GbE plus a PCIe slot for 10GbE or extra NVMe
  • +HDMI 2.0 out for local 4K playback

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’QTS interface is overwhelming for a first-time NAS owner
  • โˆ’Inherits QNAP's weaker security reputation, so internet exposure needs care
  • โˆ’Costs more than the DS224+ while asking more of the user
Best for Budget media servers and tinkerers who want power and ports for less $450 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
#5 Best for first-party apps

Synology DS423+

A 4-bay that leans on DSM and dual NVMe cache for a smooth files-and-photos hub.

Trust 82
82/100

What holds up

  • +Four bays plus two M.2 NVMe cache slots for snappier everyday use
  • +Excellent Synology Photos and Drive experience for family use
  • +Quiet and power-efficient for 24/7 operation

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’Celeron J4125 and only 1GbE ports feel dated for the price in 2026
  • โˆ’No meaningful hardware transcoding for demanding Plex setups
  • โˆ’RAM ceiling of 6GB limits container and VM ambitions
Best for Households wanting a 4-bay DSM box for Synology Photos and backups, not transcoding $430 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
#6 Premium pick

QNAP TS-673A

The flexible power-user choice when you want bays, cores, and 2.5GbE without paying Synology rack prices.

Trust 84
84/100

What holds up

  • +AMD Ryzen V1500B (8 threads) handles VMs and containers comfortably
  • +Six bays plus dual 2.5GbE and PCIe expansion room
  • +Strong value per dollar against comparable Synology Plus and rack units

Where it falls short

  • โˆ’No integrated GPU, so no hardware transcoding on this model
  • โˆ’QTS plus Virtualization Station has a real learning curve
  • โˆ’QNAP security history means you should keep it off the open internet
Best for Power users running VMs, containers, and heavy multi-user workloads $900 (diskless, before drives)
Check price
Straight answers

Questions worth asking first

Synology or QNAP: which should I actually buy in 2026?+

Buy Synology if you want the box to mostly manage itself, you like polished first-party apps (Photos, Drive, Hyper Backup), and a calmer security history matters to you. Buy QNAP if you want more hardware for the money, you need built-in hardware transcoding for Plex or Jellyfin, you want 2.5GbE and HDMI out as standard, or you plan to run lots of VMs and containers. For a typical home user who values simplicity, Synology edges it. For a media server or tinkerer on a budget, QNAP usually wins.

Is QNAP safe to use given its ransomware history?+

It can be, but you have to do the work. QNAP has been hit by real, widely reported ransomware campaigns (Deadbolt and Qlocker among them), largely against devices exposed directly to the internet. If you keep QTS patched, never port-forward the admin interface, disable UPnP, use a VPN for remote access, and avoid exposing services directly, the practical risk drops a lot. Synology has had fewer major incidents, but no NAS is safe if you expose it carelessly. Treat any NAS as something that should sit behind a firewall, not on the open internet.

Do I need hardware transcoding, and which brand has it?+

You need it mainly for Plex or Jellyfin when clients cannot play a file directly and the server must convert it on the fly, especially for 4K or multiple simultaneous streams. The Intel-based QNAP units here (TS-264, TS-464) include an integrated GPU that does this well. The Synology Plus models in this guide use AMD CPUs without an iGPU, so they do not hardware transcode. If your devices can direct-play your files (common with modern apps and good clients), transcoding matters far less and Synology's other strengths come back into play.

How does Frank make money?+

Affiliate links. If you buy through one of our Amazon search links we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. That commission never changes our rankings, our trust scores, or which products we recommend. We picked the DS923+ as our top overall and the QNAP TS-464 as best value based on software, hardware value, transcoding, and security track record, not on which one pays more. If a product is the right call we say so, and we always list at least one real downside for every pick.

Want a live ranking on this?

Run a fresh report. Frank reads the latest reviews, sources every claim, and is done in about 1 to 2 minutes.

Research this live →